Skip to main content

Understanding Comics: Identity and Expression (3 Points)

 One of the topics that Scott McCloud discusses about in his comic, Understanding Comics, is that we use a variety of styles and symbols to represent humans, and he talks about how far we can go in simplifying the human face and still recognize it as a human face. He goes on to talk about how simplified cartoons of ourselves and in general are more universal, and therefore, more pleasant to their audience. Being someone in the art world, I get to experience this theory on a day-to-day basis. Most times when viewing self portraits of my friends, I find that they use a stylized version of themselves. By drawing a caricature of themselves, they open up the appeal of the drawing to more people, and it becomes a desire of others to see themselves in that style. McCloud also explains that, when we see a realistic face, we do not see ourselves represented in it, yet if we see a cartoon of anyone, we can see a bit of ourselves in it. While he explains this as being a result of never truly seeing ourselves but having a good understanding of an abstract of our face, I believe there is another reason for this occurrence. When we see a cartoon, we do not get the full picture of it as we would in realism, therefore our minds interpret the gaps we do not see. And while our interpretation of a 'real-life' version of the cartoon might not look like us, it looks like how we think it to look, giving it our personal stamp on the drawing. It is what makes us want to see ourselves in that style and why so many artists will make themselves in a popular art style. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The History of Comics: The Loss of Ownership (3 Points)

 One trend that I felt was interesting, albeit upsetting, was that with the incentive of making money by creating comics, the lines of ownership of the artist's creation seem to blur. Of course, other factors lead to the uncertainty of giving credit where credit is due, such as having multiple people working towards one comic. However, I feel that when comics became more mainstream, companies valued the income that comics made over the treatment of the artist that created them. In particular, on pages 109 and 110 of The Comic Book History of Comics that Marvel allowed for the continuation of Stan Lee as the sole credit of their comics for quite some time, leaving artists like Steve Ditko and Jack Kirby unhappy with their lack of recognition. Marvel (and Stan Lee) made profit off of Stan Lee's rise to fame, practically letting people believe he was a genius for creating such works by himself. In actuality, talented artists were drawing and plotting the comics while Stan sometime...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Favorite Thing is Monsters (6 Points)

For the week that we read these, we were asked to discuss whether the comics we read should be considered literary or not. My first reaction was to break down what made something 'literary'. I was inclined to say that as long as something had words and was telling a story with some amount of depth, then that was what I considered literary. However, I realized while talking with team members about this question that I had a new consideration of literary comics. I like to think of comics the same way I think about art, and that is that anything can be art. I do not think that we have to tie down the constraints of what is and is not literary because that can put writers who just want to create into a bubble. Whether I used my old definition or my new definition, I think My Favorite Thing is Monsters is definitely a literary comic. It masterfully uses its media to tell a fantastic and relatable story. Everything about the comic felt real and was very engaging, the art felt in sync...
Post a Comment
Read more

American Born Chinese (3 Points)

 I read American Born Chinese about two years ago for the Asian and Asian American Diaspora LMST Class, but I did not quite remember everything that happened, so I decided to read it again. While there are seemingly three story lines, they all merge into one at the end, which caught me off guard again the second time reading it. I definitely think this fits into the category of literary comics. Not only does it have great writing, it tells a compelling story that really makes the reader stop to think. While I cannot say that I relate to this story in the same way, I can see how this story could be relatable. I feel like this is an important novel that everyone should take a second and read. I also really enjoyed the pacing of this novel, both in the sense of the three stories coming together as one and in the panel by panel framing of the scenes. The writer understands well how to use blank panels and pages. 
Post a Comment
Read more