Skip to main content

5 Underground Comics (3 Points)

 Air Pirates: This set of comics were very uncomfortable to read. It took many famous cartoon characters and turned them into what is essentially porn. In most cases, the women would take the brunt of the sexuality in these comics, yet they would (most of the time) end up 'wanting it'. To me, this shows the horrible mindset of the artists making these comics. In addition to being super raunchy, the comics were also just difficult to read along to. The panels were laid out in a way that was counterintuitive to where my eye wanted to go. I do not see much similarities of this comic in comparison to comics today other than the characters, 

Gay Comics No. 1: This was much more pleasant to read than the first link of comics. One important detail to remember when reading this set of comics is that it was created by and for gay people. Keeping this in mind, these comics were actually relatable as well as enjoyable. These comics, while still having sexual themes and scenes, came off more as telling a story, rather than the comics before reading as a pervert's sexual fantasy. 

Girl Fight Comics No. 1: Some of these comics necessitate the readers to look into the authors, and I felt that this was one of them. I found her characterization of black people- women in particular- unsettling. She seems to use them more so as a prop for diversity (if you could call it that) rather than an actual character. She gives most of her characters this treatment, in fact, as they are only their seemingly for the shock factor or for a specific audience, which in this comic's case, it seems like this was geared towards men with very particular fetishes. Being as though this is one of the first comics we are learning about that is created by a woman, it is possible that she had to include content like this as a way to 'fit in', but I do not think that excuses her portrayal of racial and female characters. 

Come Out Comix: Comparing this comic to the previous ones, it was pretty good. It was similar to Gay Comics No. 1 in that it dealt with sexuality and contained sexual content, but it was not anywhere close to the borderline porn that Air Pirates was. It has a lot of similar themes to coming out stories, like owning who you are and being confident in your sexuality. Seeing that these kinds of topics existed beyond modern years is cool.

Naked Hostility: I wanted to get a good range of comics, so I chose this for my last comic of this set. The images in between the actual comics were a bit odd, but a good chunk were mostly tame. However, I feel that this story, just like Air Pirates, uses their position as a creator as an excuse to create something that is offensive towards women. This comic does not seem to push that power as far as Air Pirates did, but it still is off-putting at times.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Favorite Thing is Monsters (6 Points)

For the week that we read these, we were asked to discuss whether the comics we read should be considered literary or not. My first reaction was to break down what made something 'literary'. I was inclined to say that as long as something had words and was telling a story with some amount of depth, then that was what I considered literary. However, I realized while talking with team members about this question that I had a new consideration of literary comics. I like to think of comics the same way I think about art, and that is that anything can be art. I do not think that we have to tie down the constraints of what is and is not literary because that can put writers who just want to create into a bubble. Whether I used my old definition or my new definition, I think My Favorite Thing is Monsters is definitely a literary comic. It masterfully uses its media to tell a fantastic and relatable story. Everything about the comic felt real and was very engaging, the art felt in sync...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eisner Novel: A Contract with God (3 Points)

 This graphic novel was a tough read for me since it brought up some pretty touchy subjects. I think that Eisner dives into some sensitive subject because it was unique from the comparably 'safe' comics that others were producing. In the first part, it deals with a man who has been told all his life that God will favor him, but God betrays his trust when he takes away the life of his adopted daughter. Initially, I thought this story might have been a criticism of God and how people use him, but it seemed to make it more about making a victim of childhood lies into a bad guy and killing him off. I felt that this story was more about the unfairness surrounding the 'truths' he was told in his childhood. He was told all of his childhood life that because he did good things and helped people, God would help him and be there for him. Yet, when he needs God, his daughter dies, and understandably, he gets upset. It is upsetting that the comic makes such a bad thing out of going...
Post a Comment
Read more