Skip to main content

The Killing Joke (2 Points)

 1. What is your reaction to the text you just read?

Well, there were definitely parts that I did not vibe with, but there were also parts I enjoyed. As a whole, I think it does a really good job of story-telling and creating complex characters, as well as the timing for the story was very spot on. However, I had a problem with the major 'lesson'. I'm not sure that lesson is the right choice of word, but I did not like that despite all that the Joker had done just in that night alone, Batman was still willing to help him in a peaceful manner. He traumatized two people who may not be able to walk the world in the same way that they had before this night, yet Batman wants Joker to have a better life. It almost seems like this is for a selfish reason too, since his driving force in his decision is that he could die if he does not help him.

2. What connections did you make with the story? Discuss what elements of the story with which you were able to connect?

I'm not sure people were meant to connect with this story. Certainly, people have gone through trauma, just like the joker has, but to say that you could connect to him because you also have trauma is connecting yourself to a very bad person who took his trauma and used it as a weapon. I also do not think Batman is a very connectable character as well, since he has such a high standard of morals and he is in a position of being very rich and this superhero that people are intimidated by.

3. What changes would you make to adapt this story into another medium? What medium would you choose; what changes would you make?

I think the only other medium that could work well for this story and this set of characters is animation. When brought into realism, it loses its fictional touch, and whatever sense of relatability that some viewers have could easily be thrown out the window upon seeing them in real life. I would probably change the story line however so that his crimes target Batman specifically or people that have wronged Joker, rather than innocent people.

4. In what ways does this story differ from the typical expectations the reader might have for a superhero story?

I think this story does stray away from the 'every-bad-guy-must-be-brought-to-justice' trope that I see more often in Marvel. It gives the bad guys more complexity, and with that, gives the hero more of a reason to believe they can change. Batman, rather than trying to take Joker down by any means necessary, tries to give him the benefit of the doubt and come to an agreement with him. We see Joker in his maniacal self try to consider the possibility even. It is a nice change of pace compared to typical superhero stories. I wish, however, that it was under different circumstances and did not have to involve the violence and degradation of the two innocent people, especially the girl since it seemed more like a reason to draw a naked girl.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Favorite Thing is Monsters (6 Points)

For the week that we read these, we were asked to discuss whether the comics we read should be considered literary or not. My first reaction was to break down what made something 'literary'. I was inclined to say that as long as something had words and was telling a story with some amount of depth, then that was what I considered literary. However, I realized while talking with team members about this question that I had a new consideration of literary comics. I like to think of comics the same way I think about art, and that is that anything can be art. I do not think that we have to tie down the constraints of what is and is not literary because that can put writers who just want to create into a bubble. Whether I used my old definition or my new definition, I think My Favorite Thing is Monsters is definitely a literary comic. It masterfully uses its media to tell a fantastic and relatable story. Everything about the comic felt real and was very engaging, the art felt in sync...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eisner Novel: A Contract with God (3 Points)

 This graphic novel was a tough read for me since it brought up some pretty touchy subjects. I think that Eisner dives into some sensitive subject because it was unique from the comparably 'safe' comics that others were producing. In the first part, it deals with a man who has been told all his life that God will favor him, but God betrays his trust when he takes away the life of his adopted daughter. Initially, I thought this story might have been a criticism of God and how people use him, but it seemed to make it more about making a victim of childhood lies into a bad guy and killing him off. I felt that this story was more about the unfairness surrounding the 'truths' he was told in his childhood. He was told all of his childhood life that because he did good things and helped people, God would help him and be there for him. Yet, when he needs God, his daughter dies, and understandably, he gets upset. It is upsetting that the comic makes such a bad thing out of going...
Post a Comment
Read more